31 Mar 2017

Film Summary: February and March 2017

When I returned from the United States in mid-February I committed myself to change and renewal. In many areas I think I've achieved considerably positive results: Applying a more diligent work ethic, eating healthier, exercising more regularly etc. Perhaps the biggest thing of all was committing myself to getting back to my true nature. I've felt somewhat distant from my film passions lately because of busy schedules, but I'm going back to revisit the movies that made me fall in love with the medium in the first place. I haven't rewatched so many movies in ages. But this post is just looking at the movies I saw for the first time over the last two months. I saw 21 in total and here's what I thought of them.

Finding Dory (2016) – 8/10 
When the forgetful fish Dory sets out on a journey to find her parents she learns about both the value of family and her own unique abilities. It would seem unlikely that this movie would live up to expectation, but the sequel to ‘Finding Nemo’ pulls it off and for the record I might even say it’s more worthwhile to think of it as Dory’s own movie. Pixar has constructed a sequel that is funny, exciting and surprisingly heartfelt. What was immediately most apparent to me was that the film is much less an externalised tale of Dory’s separation from Marlin and Nemo, but rather her memory. Perhaps it doesn’t draw from all of its predecessors themes, but it has its own methods of drawing you in. For a family movie it has a mild psychological quality that keeps it moving steadily. This technique is fascinating, but hardly compares to the joy of simply seeing these great characters on a new adventure. ‘Finding Dory’ doesn’t beat the 2003 original, but it’s a touching follow-up to a modern animated classic.

House (1977) – 8.5/10
Oshare, a schoolgirl takes six of her friends to her aunt’s house in the countryside unaware of a ghostly presence that’s looking to destroy them. It might be easy to initially dismiss ‘House’ aka ‘Hausu’ for a generic title and premise, but it’s unlike any other haunted house movie (or for that matter any other movie in general) I’ve ever seen. The Criterion Collection has labelled it both “a psychedelic ghost tale” and “an episode of Scooby-Doo as directed by Mario Bava.” I can’t help but see it as an experimental merging of cinematic techniques, popular culture and plain insanity. While the first half of the film can be slow its gradual descent into a surreal horror picture mark it out as a perfect case study of why some movies become cult films. Its images sit on a line between beautiful and disturbing, its sudden changes in tone between horrifying and playful are enjoyably bizarre and its creative ambition is omnipresent in every scene. ‘House’ cannot be described, but it really is a gripping, if unconventional experience.

Rebecca (1940) – 8/10
A young but shy woman marries a wealthy aristocrat, but finds she can’t escape the lasting memory of her new husband’s deceased former wife, Rebecca. ‘Rebecca’ is the amazing Alfred Hitchcock’s first American-sponsored project and the film that took home Best Picture of 1940. Although it doesn’t feature an identical style of the Master of Suspense’s work from the late 40s onwards, it evidenced that the filmmaker would remain a Hollywood force for the remainder of his life. This film is much less a thriller more a mystery with beautiful film-noir and gothic touches. From the use of shadow, fog and extravagant sets, Hitchcock stirs up a great sense of unease and applies it consistently. Like any other film in his catalogue, characters are a driving force towards the realising our curiosities and in this instance Joan Fontaine’s character’s growth from shy observation to full understanding of the world around her. A great flick and only the beginning of Hitchcock’s Hollywood achievements.

The Blade (1995) – 7/10
The master of a sword factory abdicates and appoints his least popular blacksmith, who instead seeks out the man that killed his father in spite of the loss of his arm to bandits. From Hark Tsui, the Hong Kong filmmaker famed for his ‘Once Upon A Time in China’ trilogy takes on the ambitious project of remaking the Shaw Brothers’ and Chang Cheh’s martial arts classic ‘One-Armed Swordsman.’ To be honest the film fell slightly below my expectations for the very reasons it’s been praised. Ding-on’s story is one of honor and its conflict with being crippled, but I found the film’s focus points to be unusual. I loved the use of narration, but felt it was delivered by the wrong character, and while its action is brilliantly choreographed I thought that the accompanying cinematography was erratic to the point of detriment. More often than not, I thought too much was dedicated to action and too little to character, a balance where the original excelled.

Destroy All Monsters (1968) – 7/10
Aliens invade Earth and release the kaiju contained on the island imprisonment Monster Land and use them to force a takeover of the planet, forcing humanity to respond for its survival. For some ‘Destroy All Monsters’ is a fan favourite, but for me it’s a bit to uneven for me to consider it such. At times it achieves as far as giant monster movies go, and other times just proves to be dull. I think the core issue is that the wrong movie was made when there was the potential for something brilliant. Its ensemble of kaiju is a dream come true, but the very reason fans love these movies is underused save for a wonderful finale to make room for a cast of one-dimensional human characters and their respective stories. It warrants more focus on its dramatic writing, though where it delivers is in its fantastic monster brawl. That’s why Godzilla movies are so fun, and for what was originally going to be the grand end of the franchise it needed more. ‘Destroy All Monsters’ is mostly an okay feature with pockets of excellence.

Days of Wine and Roses (1962) – 8.5/10
An alcoholic progressively gets his new wife hooked on booze to share what he believes is happiness with her, but finds that it also might be what tears their marriage apart when he pursues sobriety. A few years ago I fell in love with Billy Wilder’s 1945 film ‘The Lost Weekend’ for it being an exceptional, close-to-home depiction of alcoholism and ‘Days of Wine and Roses’ is arguably just as great for it hits all the boxes on the anti-drinking movie checklist. I’ve yet to see any of director Blake Edwards’ Pink Panther movie, but this film really impressed me and is driving me to see more of his work. ‘Days of Wine and Roses’ is as much a tale of committed romance as it is a horror story on the degenerative effects of addiction. As much credit as I’d love to give to Jack Lemmon and Lee Remick’s redemptive and depressing performances, I think the movie’s greatest strength is in its tonal shifts. Sometimes it’s upbeat, and then it suddenly takes on a sinister vibe through dramatic changes in its visual techniques. Despite dealing with a tough and relevant topic, I consider it to be as much as cautionary tale as it is a source of hope for those in the same place as the Clay couple.

Bus Stop (1956) – 7/10
During a trip to Phoenix, a stubborn young cowboy from Montana falls in love with a saloon singer, and aggressively pursues her even when she pushes back his advances. ‘Bus Stop’ is an unusual Marilyn Monroe film given that it isn’t a straight-up comedy or musical. It’s fascinating because there’s little way I could imagine a movie like this being released today in the same vein of melodrama. The film is just as much a tale about a young man’s ignorance about what love is as it is a depressing tale about an aspiring star’s victimisation by what could only be described as an obsessive stalking. Monroe’s performance, while not one of her very best, delivers in being just below enough her usual standard for us to doubt her character Cherie’s strength. This in turn highlights the gross intolerability of Don Murray’s Bo. Though this character is played in part humorously for his boisterousness and stubborn attitude, I personally found him incredibly unlikable. The film carries itself at a steady pace and its final act is where it really shows its guns, but I personally disliked its happy ending which I found contradictory with its other lessons.

The Mirror (1975) – 7.5/10
A dying poet recalls his past, particularly his childhood during WWII and the memories of his mother. ‘The Mirror’ is perhaps famed Soviet director Andrei Tarkovsky’s most personal film given its semi-autobiographic nature, but in too many ways it’s also a film specially catered to the generation of Russians that can remember the Great Patriotic War. This and the additional fact that it’s an art film and much of its drama is hidden below the surface will no doubt make it hard to digest for some audiences. Even I admit that I enjoyed it less than his following film ‘Stalker.’ However, it has many qualities that I think make it near-essential for movie enthusiasts. The cinematography by George Reberg is stunningly beautiful and takes advantage of practical effects and the wilderness, and while an unconventional narrative structure is hard getting used to, Tarkovsky’s various stylistic choices grip you just enough to pull you into its trance-like effect. Not for everyone, but that’s the nature of many of Tarkovsky’s works.

Precious (2009) – 7.5/10
An illiterate and overweight teen girl from Harlem pregnant with her second child enrols in an alternative school with the hopes of improving her future and escaping her abusive home life. ‘Precious’ is the last of 2009’s Best Picture nominees I had to see and potentially my least favourite of the ten. I had concerns about Lee Daniels’ place as director and a possible ethnocentric preachiness, but I largely found the film to be very honest and not afraid to linger on some truly depressing notes. Where the film triumphs is in its readiness to deal with the grim realities, particularly those in the black community in the 1980s. Abuse and urban poverty as well as the power of education are all strong themes, and are personified through a talented cast. My biggest gripe is with some of Daniels’ stylistic choices which are often over-the-top and unnecessary and often complicate a tale that should be told in the most direct manner possible.

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920) – 8/10
In the town of Holstenwall, the hypnotist Dr. Caligari uses his somnambulist Cesare to commit a series of murders, drawing the attention of a group of pursuers. One of the most notable silent features to come out of Weimar-era Germany and one of the great landmarks in the horror genre. It’s taken me far too long to see ‘Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari’ but I’m very glad I finally made the time for it. Aside from still being very creepy almost a hundred years since its original release, it’s a wonderful piece both visually and sonically that epitomises the creativity of many filmmakers in the period of German expressionism. The film’s most striking feature is its twisted visual style that makes use of unusual structures and warped landscapes and drawings that in conjunction with its haunting musical score create other-worldly qualities. Though its production elements are the most striking, it’s fascinatingly symbolic of Germany’s WWI experience and the ineptitude of the authorities. First and foremost, it’s a great horror film that has truly stood the test of time.

13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi (2016) – 7.5/10
In the volatile environment of post-Gaddafi Libya, the unofficial CIA base in Benghazi comes under attack by a horde of Islamist militants while the security team tries to protect their allies and find a way out of the situation. It seems unusual that Michael Bay, a director whose being criticised for empty-headed blockbusters has reached a near-comedic status would give us a film about a real world issue. This isn’t to say ’13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi’ reaches its full potential, but it’s a remarkable improvement over the director’s usual work. It’s restrained on its political judgements and makes an effort to pay tribute to those involved. Sadly it does suffer from an indulgence into the intensity of its action sequences and substitutes character development with common war movie clichés. Some might say it’s a mature work, but I think that only applies in comparison to what it could have been. It has a realistic vibe that’s genuinely horrifying, evidencing Bay did his homework for once and despite what I may feel I’ll give credit where it’s due. Well done Michael.

Blue Jasmine (2013) – 8/10
A New York socialite divorced from her wealthy husband moves in with her sister in San Francisco, bringing with her haunting memories of a privileged past and narcissistic behaviours that hurt those around her. Woody Allen’s ‘Blue Jasmine’ is, on top of the wonder ‘Midnight in Paris’ proof that the comedian and director is at a new high point in his career and his filmography is ready to evolve with the times. While often called an uncredited remake of ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’ I find this too belittling a comment and prefer to see it as a partial tribute to the classic. Where ‘Blue Jasmine’ succeeds is all within the titular character. She’s both a complex echo of what she once was, and a fascinating insight into mental illness. The film benefits greatly from its structure, and both its flashbacks and scenes in the immediate story sit comfortably on the line between the dramatic and the humorous. I think both major enthusiasts looking for a fresh tale and casual viewers will have something to like in ‘Blue Jasmine’ for its wonderful cast, visual style, story structure and its plentiful doses of comedy and tragedy.

Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016) – 8/10
After a rebellious kid and his nature-loving foster uncle go missing in the New Zealand wilderness, a nationwide manhunt is ordered when the authorities believe their disappearance is more sinister. A huge hit in both its native New Zealand and abroad, ‘Hunt for the Wilderpeople’ is both touching and very funny. With its humour being based largely on the absurdity of the situation and the offbeat nature of its two leads one might be led to believe that the movie is a mindless on-the-run film that throws its characters into increasingly unbelievable scenarios. This element certainly rings true to an extent, but the heart of the story is one based on abandonment anxieties and family loyalty. Sam Neill is wonderful as expected, but I was equally impressed by young Julian Dennison’s performance as Ricky that communicates just the right level of childlike innocence and youthful ignorance. While its undertones of freedom are prevalent it’s best to see this as a fantastical, sometimes-dark father-son comedy.

Sea of Love (1989) – 8/10
A detective investigating a series of murders where the killer finds victims through a newspaper dating section gets involved with a woman who may or may not be the culprit. The 1980s marked a quiet time for Al Pacino, where he only starred in 5 films but there’s no doubt that every time he brings in the best performance imaginable. This continues to prove true with ‘Sea of Love,’ a film that I’ve known about for years, but just never got around to seeing. While on one side it’s little more than a run-of-the-mill murder mystery, the other end is a great romantic thriller full of subtlety and one that leaves you lingering with questions. Al Pacino’s performance communicates the loneliness and uncertainties of Det. Frank Keller wonderfully, but reveals more layers through wonderful chemistry with Ellen Barkin and John Goodman. It’s a film that keeps you guessing and while not always the most consistently energetic, it is full of brilliant surprises and makes for a solid release that doesn’t fit into one lone genre.

X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) – 7.5/10
Thousands of years after his original appearance, the first mutant Apocalypse re-emerges in 1983, recruits a small group of powerful followers to achieve a worldwide cleansing which forces the X-Men, both young and old to respond. Following from the wonderful ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ is what really should have been the most grand film in this entire series, but sadly it falls short in too many areas. I can’t pin the reason why something with such potential came out so flawed to one factor alone, but writing is a big issue. At times it’s a great service to many of its characters, providing engaging origin stories for some and growth for others. Fassbender’s Magneto, McAvoy’s Xavier and Lawrence’s Mystique are as fantastic ever. However, Oscar Isaac’s Apocalypse is a one-dimensional goof and hardly threatening as a villain, and coupled with some out-of-place humour really distorts the established sense of stakes. It’s a film with strong themes, but serves its action before anything else and this makes ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ enjoyable, but a missed opportunity.

The Tin Drum (1979) – 7.5/10
After deciding not to grow up and becoming attached to a tin drum to protest the normality of his family life, a young boy sees the rise and fall of the Nazi regime. The Winner for Best Foreign Language Film of 1979, ‘The Tin Drum’ is a most unusual way of telling a story that has become familiar throughout cinema: the Adolf Hitler regime as seen through the eyes of the common citizen. I found it quite daring that a West German film would openly examine what could only have been a deeply taboo topic only 30 years after the end of WWII. It’s far from my favourite movie of this kind, but some aspects are truly admirable. Young David Bennent’s performance as Oskar is among some of the best I’ve ever seen from a child actor, and in the most quirky way it often provides a childlike view of the Nazis without obscuring the harsh realities either. What I took home most of all is one important truth and that’s that life continued as normal for many people and that façade of normality and the passiveness of the German people is partially to blame for everything that happened after 1933.

Unbroken (2014) – 8/10
During his wartime service, Olympian Louis Zamperini survives a near-fatal plane crash, spends weeks on a raft and is then sent to a prisoner-of-war camp where he’s subjected to inhumane treatment by the Japanese. The Second World War carries with it innumerable tales of individuals that are worthy of a cinematic treatment, and Zamperini’s is but one of these. It’s a tale of the human spirit, the endurance of faith and the ease by which ill-treatment occurs in a wartime context. Although controversy centres around the extent of the film’s truth and its depiction of the Japanese I think it tells reveals an important fact that’s universally applicable. The ‘othering’ of people and nationalism are precursors to human rights abuses as was the case in Japan’s war crimes. Equally as important, it’s a triumph of character with its showcasing the commoner surviving against the odds is aided by a crisp visual style and a powerful performance by Jack O’Connell. Director Angelina Jolie has done well with the Coen brothers’ script.

Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed (1969) – 7.5/10
Baron Frankenstein takes a young doctor and his fiancée hostage to conduct a new experiment, the transplanting of a mentally ill person’s brain into a new body. The fifth film in the Hammer Frankenstein series reinforces the fact that these movies are consistently chilling and provide the sense that this version of Dr Frankenstein’s ventures are endless. Admittedly this sequel doesn’t do much that’s new and comparatively seems tamer in its subject matter compared to more daring predecessors. What it does address however is one of the great aspirations of medical and cognitive science: the idea of transferring consciousness. While depicted as an exploit of the horrific, it’s one of the few instances that I found Baron Frankenstein (played brilliantly as always by Cushing) as a sympathetic character. Not the best, but not the weakest either.

Rubber (2010) – 6.5/10
While a group of spectators watch the “film” from a distance, a tire named Robert comes to life, discovers it has powerful psychokinetic powers and then uses them to wreak destruction upon humanity. The English-language French production in premise sounds like a B-grade cult film and most of the time gets most of the expected appeal out of its premise. Sadly ‘Rubber’ doesn’t reach its potential as a horror movie due to writer-director Quentin Dupieux’s desire to be artsy in his storytelling in a film that seriously does not warrant it. The result is something that’s greatly amusing in some ways, but irritatingly pretentious in others. The performances are generally quite poor, but the real fun comes from over-the-top gore effects and the sense of wonder stemming from its self-admitted desire to exist for “no reason.” Where ‘Rubber’ fails is its approach of revealing story through ‘spectators’ and its fourth wall breaks. It’s an instance of taking the desire to be unique way too far at the expense of the silliness that serves it best.

Lifeboat (1944) – 8/10
After a ship is torpedoed and sunk the survivors find themselves on a lifeboat with a German seaman from the U-Boat that attacked. Among Alfred Hitchcock’s earlier works before he would become known as the Master of Suspense a few years later, ‘Lifeboat’ is a gripping survival story specific to the WWII period. The question of who one can trust even in the most desperate hour is fascinatingly as much of a drive to the film’s drama as is the expectancy of these characters’ survival. Regardless of the setting I feel that it provides a more universal observation that we’re all human and benefit from one another’s cooperation. Hitchcock communicates a sense of isolation by limiting the use of music to convey distance from civilisation, but more effectively explores this distance through the behaviour of its different characters, all of whom perform wonderfully. Although it’s no ‘Vertigo,’ I don’t see ‘Lifeboat’ disappointing admirers of the great Alfred Hitchcock.

Schlock (1973) – 7.5/10
A small town is terrorized by a series of murders committed by an ape-like creature, who turns out to be a missing link in the evolutionary chain and falls in love with a blind girl. The directorial debut of John Landis has for many years been an incredibly rare release due to low DVD production, but while I wouldn’t say it’s objectively a good film it’s something I would recommend out of the sheer joy it brings. ‘Schlock’ is a homage B-grade monster movies of the past and the origin of Landis’ ‘See You Next Wednesday’ Easter egg. There’s a real sense of fun throughout the production coupled with the feeling that no rules are applied. People behave in absurd ways, Schlock adopts both a villainous persona and a place of your pity and random gags come out of nowhere. It’s evident the making of this film was laid back, but even with that in mind Landis did fine in his first role as director.



My Top 10 Movies for February and March 2017
1. Days of Wine and Roses
2. House
3. Rebecca
4. Hunt for the Wilderpeople
5. The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
6. Unbroken
7. Blue Jasmine
8. Sea of Love
9. Lifeboat
10. Finding Dory

No comments:

Post a Comment